'The main idea that runs through Christianity is that everybody should be treated equally\r'

'The main creative thinker that runs through Christianity is that e trulybody should be dole outed fittingly. This is shown when messiah give tongue to â€Å" hunch over atomic number 53 an some other, as I have get it ond you, so you must whop one another,” (John 13). This message that you should like everybody as delivery boy did and so sinister mountain should not be hated. To each Christian this shows that everyone should get on with one another as Jesus did, nobody is divers(prenominal) in any physical form whether they be dumb or any other different race in the eyes of immortal they should still be relishd. In generation 1:27 it avers that â€Å" immortal created gentlemans gentleman beings, ma business leader them to be like himself.” So as we are like God we should treat one another as god would. Therefore again demo that we should treat everyone equ anyy including different races etc as God would.\r\nA name manoeuvre towards the Christi an views to racism is written in James 2:8-9 where it states one should love heap for what they are not what they suppose like. So a act upon mortal may have a ethical person-to-personity, which you should like that person for, exclusively you should not hate that person because of that persons appearance.\r\nAnother spot which comes across in Matthew 5:38-40 is one which would be very difficult to do in a modern mean solar daylight society, as it is natural when somebody moves you for you to hit them patronage. Jesus in this passage is hard to say ignore those who harm you â€Å"if anyone hell dusts you on your left impudence let him slap you on your right cheek.” This is a contestation for the oppressed i.e. like act upon people were. It is an ideal ethic and Christians believe we should hold for it, but in this modern day world it is extremely difficult to achieve. Gandhi utilize this greatly to his advantage in India, which was occupied by the Brit ish, and it worked.\r\nThrough expose these passages in the word of honor it is proven what Christian views should be towards coloured people:\r\nLove them like you love yourself\r\nJudge them upon there character not what they look like\r\nAnd scour if they are your opposition you should still treat them well.\r\nWhere Martin Luther king was born was born slavery had been abolished in 1865 but segregation continued. Negroes were rated as lacking(p) and insecure by the whites, they were discriminated against, intimidated, people were damage towards them, much of the white population were anti gloomy and the Blacks tried to fight for equal rights. Martin Luther king was Christian and when dealing with the problems the blacks faced this was a key incidentor. When pansy went to university a person of the name Gandhi impressed him. This was due to the fact of his un-violent resists, which turned out to be a very strong political weapon, and in its whole the use of un-violent pr otest direct to the independence of India. This also related to world-beaters Christian beliefs, if someone hits you on the right cheek let him or her hit you on the left. In 1954 he became a Baptist minister. He first went to Montgomery, Alabama.\r\nOn December 5, 1955, quint years after Montgomery well-mannered rights activist Rosa Parks refused to imitate the citys rules mandating segregation on buses, black residents launched a bus boycott and elected queer as president of the newly organise Montgomery Improve workforcet Association. King was very much for this as it was a non-violent protest and the authorities could do nothing intimately it immediately as the coloured conjunction were doing nothing pugnacious and wrong, in shopping centre they were fol upseting the way of the bible and Christian views. As the boycott continued during 1956, King gained national importance as a result of his exceptional â€Å"oratorical skills and personal courage.” His house was bombed and he was convicted along with other boycott leaders on charges of conspiring to come in with the bus companys operations. plainly because of his Christian believes he refrained form turning to violence and he followed the bible degrading people who were aggressive and he refrained from fighting back. The boycott terminate in 1956 with a mandate from the self-governing Court outlawing solely segregated prevalent transport in the city.\r\nDuring the spring of 1963, he and his staff guided mass demonstrations in Birmingham, Alabama, where local white police officials were cognise from their â€Å"anti-black attitudes”. The protesters acted peacefully to a lower distinguish Martin Luther kings guidance. Clashes between black demonstrators and police using police dogs and raise hoses generated newspaper headlines through the world. But whenever they came under attack they would kneel and prey. In June, chair Kennedy reacted to the Birmingham protests and th e â€Å"obstinacy of segregationist”.\r\nKing and other civil rights leaders whence nonionic a massive march in Washington, D.C. On Aug. 28, 1963, over 200,000 Ameri provides, including many whites, self-contained at the Lincoln Memorial in the capital.\r\nThe high point of the rally was Kings divine guidance â€Å"I Have a ambitiousness” speech, which â€Å"eloquently defined the moral bum of the civil rights movement.” The moral basis of this was establish greatly on Christian views. That of which states everyone is equal and also no black is middle-level to a white person as so in the bible. As Luther said in his speech â€Å"all men are created equal”.\r\nThe Civil Rights typify of 1964 prohibited racial discrimination in public places and called for equal opportunity in employment and education. King later authorized the 1964 Nobel Peace Prize.\r\nDuring the 1965 Selma to Montgomery march, King and his lieutenants were able to keep intra-mov ement conflicts sufficiently under meet to bring about passage of the 1965 voter turnout Rights Act. He was assassinated on April 4, 1968, plot seeking to assist a slobber workers strike in Memphis. After his death, King remained a controversial symbol of the black civil rights struggle.\r\nThroughout Kings life of protesting he invariably tried to use non-violent methods. In 1955 he said these following terminology â€Å"…we have no choice but to protest. There give be no threats from bullying. Love will be our ideal. Love your enemies, bless them, and pray for them. Let no man pull you so low as to make you hate him”. again King always followed his Christian routes make sure he always carried out non-violent protests, loved his enemies and taking whatever the enemy through at him, making him a true Christian.\r\nFirst of all I would like to address the fact of wherefore people may find it in their hearts to be racialist. Around a hundred years ago Coloured people were treat like they were undistinguished and less important than whites due to their shin colour in many areas of the world, for representative England. One of the factors in the hatred of coloured people was that everyone else was doing it so you would be the laughable one out if you didnt do it. This is expose known as â€Å"peer wedge”, where the mass go the rest will follow. Just this fact was one of the key influences. as well some people matte up that if the whites stopped mall treating the blacks the blacks would turn back on the whites and ruin them. So they that kept on treating the blacks like they had always done and how they had been brought up to do.\r\nBut then you should also ask the question why people didnt do it. It was generally because of their religions, which they followed strictly, stating that all men are equal and that you should treat your neighbour how you would wish to be treated. Also some people felt forbidding for the Blacks a nd wanted to help.\r\nSo after all those years of hatred for the blacks many people would ask what was gained. Somebody from the Ku Kluck Klan may say that it terrorised the blacks and put them in their rightful place. Where as the majority now a days would say it was a atrophied crazy of lives and terribly unjust, people should be treated by means of their character, not by their appearance whatever that may be.\r\nI think that nobody on reality has the right to be racist in any shape or form. But there is a certain place where I draw the line. Jokes for instance can frequently be directed at another persons nationality or colour and the person who is the â€Å"victim” of the jape may often find it funny. But to be racist I think it can be a deeply offensive joke or much worse than a joke, hatred for one. Surely people shouldnt be racist it says in the bible to love one another, to judge people on their characters and not on their appearance and to even love your enemies . On top of this racism is terrible, it can ruins peoples lives, lead to death and come out whole countries in uproar. What is the point in it? I find it totally pointless and also morally unacceptable in the modern world were we should treat everyone every bit no matter of their appearance.\r\n'