Comparing Numeracy Theorists

There atomic number 18 several theorists that link to mathematical schooling their views are very distinct as to how mathematical understanding develops. ace theorist that is linked to this development is Jean Pi whilet, in his research he discovered that childrens thoughts develop through taking in information. His researches as well lead him to believe that children learn in stages according to an estimated age range. These stages are as follows * Sensori-Motor age 0-2 age (using senses) Pre- usable age 2-7 years (using symbols and terminology) * Concrete Operational age 7-12 years (logical thought) * Formal Operational age 12+ years (abstract thought) He also devised the concept of schemas for children to develop, for example some children relate to the gyration schema where they learn by rotating things such as turning lights-out on and off, watching the wheels on toy cars and stirring water and new(prenominal) resources in a circular motion.An new(prenominal) exampl e of a schema is transporting, these children willing enjoy moving object around the room in contrastive ways for example moving blocks from one side of the room to the other in a bag. Another theorist linking to mathematical development is Jerome Bruner, he believed that children learned by doing and then reimagining what they have done by drawing, physical composition and copying symbols such as numbers.Bruner believed that children in stages, these stages are as follows * Enactive age 0-1 learning through doing physical movements * Iconic age 1-7 developing affable images * Symbolic age 7+ using symbols such as language to transfer thoughts He believed that a child is prone to learning and thither are certain procedures for the child to follow for cognitive process.